News

Staffordshire Connexions Face Battle To Maintain Services Following A Further £1.5 Million Cut To Budget

In a shock announcement, Staffordshire Connexions are being asked to find a further £1.5 million savings in their budget by March 2011. This is in addition to the £560,000 savings over a 7 month period, which has already been announced in the Stoke on Trent Division of the Company. The £1.5 million savings is a result of reductions in the Local Authority Area based grant received by Staffordshire County Council, which has been passed onto Staffordshire Connexions.

“Jane Heath, Branch Secretary for Staffordshire Branch of UNISON, said, “Our members are still reeling from the shock of this latest budget cut and the assertion that such high levels of savings can be obtained through cutting back on bureaucracy and other efficiency savings.”

“Staffordshire Connexions have already seen redundancies over the last 18 months as part of ongoing efficiency savings. At its peak Staffordshire Connexions employed 387 people; we are now down to 310 staff. We believe that costs have already been cut to the bone and a high level of saving will result in major impact to services and the loss of valuable front-line posts.”

“Nationally the Coalition Government is saying that they do not want to dismantle the Connexions service, yet at the same time they have already cut £467 million funding as part of the £1.165 billion cuts to Local Government.”

“Our Young people continue to be Society’s investment for the future. It is difficult to see how the continued targeting of services for our young people, such as Connexions, is contributing to this investment.”

“A consultation meeting on what the cuts will mean to staff is planned for early next week. Members are expecting that redundancies will be from the Adult Division, Foregate House and from both the Staffordshire and Stoke areas of connexions. No details are currently available but anxiety with staff is running high that this could be up to 100 redundancies.”

“Staffordshire Branch of UNISON Officers and workplace representatives will work hard to minimise the loss of jobs, to try to ensure that Connexions can continue to support the young people of Staffordshire.”

AttachmentSize
Compelling Reasons why we need to keep the Connexions Career Service.doc88 KB
Generic Connexions Flyer.doc85.5 KB

Staffordshire Braces Itself for 30% Cuts

Staffordshire Braces itself for 30% Cuts & Questions the Impact It Will Have on the Wider Community

Staffordshire Branch of UNISON condemns the decision made on 22nd July 2010 to cut £120 million from council budgets which equates to 30% over a 3 year period. 

Jane Heath, Branch Secretary, said “This level of cuts is unbelievable.  Members have already braced themselves for 25% cuts over 4 years, but this figure goes way above what is required by Government.  Let us not forget that the financial situation has been caused by the bankers, but once again it is other people’s jobs and services to the public that are required to be sacrificed to balance the accounts.” 

“What must not be forgotten is the impact this will have on Staffordshire communities and to the local economy.  The Conservative ethos is very much about personal and community responsibility.  Presumably this also includes taking on the responsibility of what job losses will mean to that community in terms of unemployment, support for those families affected and the impact that it will have with reduced ability to buy goods and services from local businesses.”

“At full Council, a great deal of commitment was given to the people of Staffordshire.  That every single pound will count.  Staffordshire will deliver a service that the people want and need.  The Coalition Government has already failed to provide what communities wanted by cutting the Building Schools for the Future programme.  Not part of the efficiency savings, but to use elsewhere.  What has happened in Tamworth is testimony to that and is an ideological decision rather than an economic one.” 

“Staffordshire County Council has not stood still over recent years with efficiency savings; the ongoing reviews and restructures are evidence of this.  Wholesale cuts can therefore only result in wholesale loss of services and jobs.  There is much talk of a difference between frontline and back office services, but there is an argument that these are not two separate entities.  The reality is that in many services what is termed as back office, if removed would have serious implications on delivery of the frontline services that they support.” 

“We await details from Council on how the 30% cuts will actually be achieved, whilst providing the services that the people of Staffordshire want, need, expect and deserve.”

Report from Parliament by Steve Elsey, Branch Communications Officer

On Monday 19th July Jane Heath and I represented our membership in participating in the protest against the academies bill and removal of BSF funding. Following the Rally and a march to Westminster we met with Stafford’s MP Jeremy Lefroy, and addressed a number of our concerns regarding the academies bill and the implications it could have for our members and staff working within his constituency. 

The main issues raised included:

  • The lack of the requirement for proper consultation with all stakeholders, including parents, communities, trade unions and staff including the requirements of TUPE in light of the first academies proposed under this legislation.  The legislation is being pushed through Parliament at a fast pace, using timescales only usually reserved for National Security issues and Anti-terrorism legislation. The timescale being looked at is the introduction of legislation for September 2010 (when Schools resume for the start of the Academic year. (The first proposed academy in Staffordshire under this bill is John Taylor High School – Barton-under-Needwood, in November 2010). 
     
  • The impact of funding Academies with the loss of funding to other schools in an area was well illustrated by the speaker at the Rally regarding the impact to Tamworth and could well be mirrored in other areas of the Authority.  Resulting in further losses to the community if the new Academies move away from those good quality services currently provided by the SCC.  The concern was this may well result in further job losses, in addition to the efficiency savings already identified.  Job losses within the administrative centre and the resulting impact this would have on the local economy.  Where would the replacement jobs come from within the area? 
     
  • The other concern was the Transfer of land.  Transfer to academy status will involve the transfer of land from the current owner.  That is transfer of assets paid for by the tax payer to the academy and it’s backers which is land provided for community use, which under academy regulations, would no longer be designated as such. 
We also raised our concerns regarding the current stalemate regarding the SSSNB proposals, and the withdrawal of funding for training of school support staff (£30m has been withdrawn nationally).
 
We hope to see Mr Lefroy contribute to the debate watch the debate on www.parliament.tv

 

Academies Bill – Save our Schools – Rally and Lobby – 19th July 2010

Representatives from Staffordshire Branch of UNISON travelled to London to join with the other Education Trade Unions – NASUWT, NUT, UNITE and GMB to press the coalition Government to reconsider its reckless plans to rush through the Academies Bill together with their recently announced halt to the funding of the BSF programme and the consequential impact that would result.  

 
The 5 trade unions were also joined by UCAT in a show of solidarity and to highlight the hundreds of thousands of jobs that are now at risk in the construction industry due to the cancellation of the Building Schools for the Future Programme.  Around 700 people attended the rally, followed by a march to Westminster and an arranged Lobby with MP’s.  The Academies Bill had its second reading and is being pushed through with extra-ordinary speed for Academies to come into effect from November this year.  This time table has previously only been applied for anti-terrorism and national security legislation.
 
The rally was hosted by NASUWT and speakers included Chris Keates, Leader of the NASUWT; Brendan Barber, Leader of the TUC and the Rt. Hon Ed Balls, Shadow Education Secretary. First hand accounts of what the loss of funding would mean to pupils, the School and the local community were provided by 2 parents and a Head Teacher. Julie Morgan a parent from Tamworth; Gordon Philips Head Teacher from The Meadows (a special school from Sandwell); Lynn Stables, parent from Fernwood School Nottinghamshire.
 
Brendan Barber referred to the wholesale dismantling of our public services.  That there was an alternative future where public services were not made to pay for the Bankers mistakes.  What we were seeing was about ideology more than necessity.  This was further echoed by many of the other speakers.  
 
Julie Morgan spoke on behalf of the families in Tamworth.  She went onto say about the impact the removal of the BSF funding had in Staffordshire and in Tamworth - “left our schools poor relations to the Academy”.  “Imagine our rage” at the cancellation of £100 million of School funding for the town, though the Academy will still get £65 million.  It was clearly an ideological decision, nothing to do with Education but the break up of our state education schools.  We now believe that that a 2 tier system will be put into place.
 
Gordon Philips Head Teacher of the Meadows a special school (College) in Sandwell spoke of the loss of £2 million of funding which would have provided vital equipment and what it meant to the students and their education.  He asked why funding could not be given to all children and said that we can not raise standards without support.  The Queen’s Government had made a decision to give BSF funding. The Queen’s Government had also now broken that agreement.  He finished by sending a clear message to the Coalition Government – if you invest in Education – you are investing in the future.
 
Lynn Stables, a member of the PTA from Fernwood School, Nottinghamshire spoke of the loss the £10 million would have meant to her school.  There had been no consultation just the money taken away.  She went onto explain what the money would be used for, Fernwood was an Excellent School but the buildings themselves had major problems and some areas were crumbling.  Lynn finished by saying that she wanted her son to have a good education but you can not access that education without a good building structure.
 
Ed Balls, Shadow Secretary of State started by thanking the trade unions for all the work they did in schools and saying that in the last 3 years he had visited over 300 schools. However when he hears comments that standards have fallen, he views this is an insult to the people and all the hard work that has taken place.  Labour during their period of office rebuilt and refurbished over 4,000 schools addressing the under funding of many years.  Cancelling now is a complete disgrace.  Effectively you are saying to the children around the country that you are not worth the investment.
 
He had been to Sandwell last week and listened to Gordon and his colleagues and what they viewed as a chance which came once in a life time.  Two weeks ago on Monday, Michael Gove, Education Secretary said he was going to rebuild your schools, the day after they were cancelled.  This action also puts at risk all those construction jobs in the private sector, at a time when we need them.
 
The Coalition Government was not using resources from the cuts to off set the budget deficit but to fund Free Schools.  Money was being taken from poor areas and given to well off areas.  The strong only working for the strong.  Money being taken away from people with disabilities.   He finished by saying that we want Government to listen. Invest in jobs, invest in the future.

Save Sakineh

Last week, an Iranian woman, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, was saved by global protests from being stoned to death. 

But she may still be hanged -- and, meanwhile, execution by stoning continues. Right now fifteen more people are on death row awaiting stoning in which victims are buried up to their necks in the ground and then large rocks are thrown at their heads. 

The partial reprieve of Sakineh, triggered by the call from her children for international pressure to save her life, has shown that if enough of us come together and voice our horror, we may be able to save her life, and stop stoning once and for all. Sign the urgent petition now and send it on to everyone you know -- let's end this cruel slaughter NOW! 
 
 
Sakineh was convicted of adultery, like all the other 12 women and one of the men awaiting stoning. But her children and lawyer say she is innocent and that she did not get a fair trial -- they state her confession was forced from her and, speaking only Azerbaijani, she did not understand what was being asked of her in court. 
 
Despite Iran's signing of a UN convention that requires the death penalty only be used for the "most serious crimes" and despite the Iranian Parliament passing a law banning stoning last year, stoning for adultery continues. 
 
Sakineh's lawyer says the Iranian government "is afraid of Iranian public reaction and international attention" to the stoning cases. And after Turkey and Britain's Foreign Ministers spoke out against Sakineh's sentence, it was suspended. 
 
Sakineh's brave children are leading the international campaign to save their mother and stop stoning. Massive international condemnation now could finally stop this sickening punishment. Let's join together today across the world to end this brutality. Sign the petition to save Sakineh and end stoning here: 
 
 
In hope and determination, 
 
Alice, David, Milena, Ben and the whole Avaaz team 
 
 
SOURCES:
 
Iranians still facing death by stoning despite 'reprieve', The Guardian: 
 
Britain condemns planned Iran stoning as 'medieval', AFP:
 

Anti-fascism: Leafleting Dates in Bilston

Facists Threaten Bilston

Bilston North by-election on Thursday 29th July will be contested by Labour, Liberal Democrats, Tory, UKIP and the fascist BNP.

Wolverhampton & Bilston Trades Union Council’s “Hope Not Hate” campaign has produced a flyer offering an alternative calling for Bilston people to come out and vote for anyone except the fascist BNP

We will deliver to 5000 homes in the ward; so far half have been done.

 

Anti-BNP Campaign Dates

 

Saturday 17th July at 10am 

Meet small car park by pool at junction Moseley Road & Prouds Lane opposite Grapes pub.

 

Saturday 17th July at 1pm: One Dudley Community Celebration, One Community Together 

Together against the Racist EDL meet Tower Street (top of The Broadway) by Dudley Zoo.

EDL supporters have caused major disruption, violence, and public disorder across the country.  Join with us, to show that the EDL do not speak for Dudley

Rally supported by the Dudley TUC, Bishop of Dudley, Dudley Central Mosque, Dudley Interfaith Network and Unite Against Fascism. 

 

Sunday 18th July 

TUC/Hope Not Hate stall at Phoenix festival, Phoenix Park, Dudley Road/Thompson Avenue, Blakenhall

Set up 10am, volunteers needed 11am - 1pm and 3pm - 4pm

 

Saturday 25th July

Meeting point Stowlawn Methodist Church‎ School Walk, Bilston, WV14 6EA

 

Sunday 26th July

To be confirmed, only if some leafleting still to do. If so, meet 10:30am Stowlawn Methodist Church‎ School Walk, Bilston, WV14 6EA

 

Thurs 29th July: By-election

Call for Councillor Expenses Hike “A Disgrace”

Plans to boost local councillors’ allowances by 2.3% were condemned as “a disgrace” today (14 July) by West Midlands UNISON, the largest public service union in the region. 

The Local Government Association (LGA), who is recommending the increase, is also calling for councillors to get paid a daily rate of £152.77 to attend LGA meetings.

Roger McKenzie, UNISON’s regional secretary, said:

“This expenses hike is a disgrace.  What a slap in the face for hard working council staff across our region, who have not been offered a single penny pay increase this year.

Rising inflation, coupled with a pay freeze, is effectively a pay cut for workers already struggling to pay their bills and keep a roof over their heads.  In contrast to civil servants and other public sector workers, local government employers are refusing to give staff paid under £21,000, including nursery workers, home carers, housing workers, leisure and parks staff, school meals and cleaners, the £250 pay rise promised in the emergency budget. Where is the justice in that?
  
Councillors should be holding the town halls in our region to account and making sure taxpayers get good value for money. Those taxpayers would be right to ask why councillors are enjoying hikes in expenses, while workers and our increasingly hard pressed communities are left out in the cold?  Across the West Midlands council workers face massive job losses and communities are losing vital services they rely on.

For the LGA to publish two sets of guidelines on the same day - one suggesting that councillors get a rise and another condemning workers to a pay freeze - is shocking.”

Public Sector Cuts

In support of public sector workers and against the planned cuts, we urgently request our members sign up to the following website which is open till 8th July 2010 http://spendingchallenge.hm-treasury.gov.uk/

 
Below are some comments already provided which you may wish to support or you may, of course, include your own.
 
Please note that this does not in any way contradict our previous communication as there is a big difference to responding giving suggestions where jobs can be cut and making your views known against the cuts public sector workers face.  These staff did not create the financial problems but it is through their jobs losses that the deficit is expected to be resolved.
 
1. 65% of local government workers earn below £21,000, pay them the £250 now!
 
2. Local government workers have the lowest pay and worst conditions of service in the public sector, don’t cut them further!
 
3. Get local residents to decide on council tax levels to maintain vital local services – not Council Tax freezes from Westminster
 
4. Stop wasting public money on privatising local services
 
5. Stop dividing ‘front’ and ‘back’ office worker. They need each other to deliver efficient and effective local services
 
6. Councils – not private companies - must continue to run local services to ensure transparency and a real say for local residents 
 
7. Stop cutting vital public services – this will make life harder for everyone, especially women and poorer households, and set back the economic recovery
 
8. Stop cutting public sector jobs – this will hit tax revenues, increase unemployment and make the deficit worse
 
9. Cut the bankers’ bonuses, and make them pay for the crisis they caused – a Robin Hood Tax could raise billions every year
 
10. Cut spending on private consultants and employment agencies – directly employed in-house staff are the best people to improve services
 
11. Cut out the privatisation profiteers – outsourcing and PFI are damaging our public services and cost the taxpayer more
 
 
Jane Heath
Branch Secretary
 

Double Standards - The Current Position on NJC Pay

This circular brings branches up to date with the Con Dem position on public sector pay, the LGA response and what we know local authorities have really put aside for cost of living increases (following a Freedom of Information request). Branches are asked to keep up the pressure on councilors and MPs for negotiations to deliver a pay rise. 

Click here to view.

UNISON cuts survey reveals where axe will fall in Further & Higher Education

Three quarters of further and higher education staff say that cuts to college and university funding will lead to course closures, according to a shocking UNISON survey, released on 21 June.

On the day that staff and students are held nationwide protests against cuts, the union released a list of courses that have already been cut or are facing cuts, including social work, languages, pharmacy, counselling, science, geography, deaf studies, beauty, sports, IT, media, Islamic studies and philosophy. 

Staff have seen students turned away from a number of colleges and universities - with 60 per cent of respondents seeing a huge reduction in vocational training. The results also reveal that thousands of support staff and teaching staff jobs will be axed, with morale among all workers hitting rock bottom. 

The union has hit back against the cuts saying they will strike communities hard and are particularly tough for workers made redundant during the recession who need to re-train, young people facing high unemployment and learners with support needs. The demonstrations over funding cuts, which will lead to thousands of job losses, have been organised jointly by UNISON, the National Union of Students (NUS), UNITE, the University and College Union (UCU), GMB, the Education Institute of Scotland (EIS) and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL). 

Dave Prentis, UNISON's General Secretary, said:

"It is shocking news for students that three quarters of staff are reporting course closures.The country cannot afford to become a low skill, low wage economy - we must invest in our future and that means investing in further and higher education.

"The education system is in danger of descending into chaos, as students are turned away from courses, vocational training is put on the backburner and thousands of staff join the record number of unemployed on the dole queues. Now is not the time for the government to cut spending in education.We need to get the economy back on track, help struggling local communities and avoid a double-dip recession.

Commenting on the survey findings, UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt,said:"Cuts have consequences and will do lasting damage to front-line provision. This survey should act as an urgent wake-up call to government. Slashing education budgets will make it harder for people to retrain during the recession and will have a devastating impact on many communities throughout the country."

Syndicate content